Evolution of the Indian Constitution | UPSC Notes

Introduction 

• The Indian Constitution serves as the cornerstone of India’s legal framework and political governance. 
• As the supreme law of the land, it reflects the nation’s ever-evolving socio-political, cultural, and economic landscape.
•  Over the decades, the Constitution has undergone several amendments to address the dynamic needs of society while ensuring the protection of its core values. 
• The journey of India’s constitutional evolution is marked by significant milestones, beginning during British colonial rule and continuing in the present day.

The Historical Development of the Indian Constitution

• The foundation of India’s Constitution traces its origins to British colonial rule, where key legislative developments laid the groundwork for its eventual creation. Here are some of the key Acts that shaped its evolution:
• Government of India Act 1858: This act marked the end of East India Company rule and established direct British governance in India. It set the stage for later constitutional reforms.
• Indian Councils Acts (1861 and 1892): These Acts introduced a limited form of representation, allowing Indians to participate in legislative processes through appointed councils. However, these councils held little real power, with the ultimate authority resting with the British government.
• Government of India Act 1909 (Morley-Minto Reforms): This Act expanded legislative councils and introduced the concept of separate electorates for Muslims, a move that formalized communal representation and set the stage for further constitutional debates.
• Government of India Act 1919 (Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms): This Act established dyarchy, dividing the functions of governance between central and provincial governments. It also granted limited self-governance, but British control remained significant.
• Government of India Act 1935: This was the most comprehensive legislative measure before independence. The Act introduced a federal structure, established a bicameral legislature, and reserved seats for minorities, shaping many of the features seen in the Indian Constitution today.

Read also: Supreme Court Judgment on the 42nd Amendment | UPSC

The Role of Parliament in Amending the Constitution

• The Indian Constitution grants Parliament the power to amend its provisions under Article 368. This provision allows Parliament to make changes to the Constitution, but there are certain limitations. 
• The Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973) established the Doctrine of Basic Structure, which restricts Parliament’s ability to alter the fundamental principles of the Constitution, such as democracy, the rule of law, and individual freedoms.
• This doctrine ensures that while Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution, any changes that threaten its basic structure cannot be made, thereby safeguarding the Constitution’s core values from political overreach.

Landmark Constitutional Amendments

• First Amendment (1951): This amendment balanced individual freedoms with social justice by enabling restrictions on speech and addressing untouchability, a crucial step in promoting social equality.
• Seventh Amendment (1956): This amendment reorganized states based on linguistic lines and updated the Union List, making the administrative structure more responsive to India’s linguistic diversity.
• Forty-Second Amendment (1976): Often referred to as the “Mini-Constitution,” this amendment centralized power in the Union government and added the words “Socialist” and “Secular” to the Preamble, reinforcing India’s commitment to these principles.
• Forty-Fourth Amendment (1978): This amendment reversed many undemocratic changes made during the Emergency and strengthened the protection of fundamental rights, ensuring that democracy remained intact.
• Fifty-Second Amendment (1985): It introduced anti-defection laws, aimed at ensuring political stability by preventing elected representatives from switching parties without consequences.
• Sixty-First Amendment (1988): This amendment lowered the voting age from 21 to 18, empowering a younger generation to actively participate in the democratic process.
• Seventy-Third and Seventy-Fourth Amendments (1992): These amendments empowered local self-governance by establishing Panchayats and Municipalities, providing reserved seats for marginalized groups, and promoting democracy at the grassroots level.
• Ninety-Ninth Amendment (2014): This amendment proposed the creation of the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) for judicial appointments, but the Supreme Court struck it down, reaffirming the importance of judicial independence.
• Hundred and First Amendment (2016): This amendment introduced the Goods and Services Tax (GST), simplifying and unifying India’s tax structure, and promoting economic integration across states.

Importance of Constitutional Amendments in India

• Ensuring Federal Balance: India’s federal framework requires constant attention to maintain a balance between Union and State powers. Amendments like the 73rd and 74th Amendments empowered local self-governance and decentralized authority, ensuring that power is more evenly distributed.
• Solving Legal Ambiguities: Some provisions of the Constitution require amendments to resolve ambiguities and conflicts in interpretation. The 42nd Amendment (1976) clarified the relationship between the Centre and States, while also expanding the Directive Principles of State Policy.
• Judicial Interpretation: Amendments are sometimes necessary to clarify or override judicial interpretations of constitutional provisions. The 24th Amendment (1971) reaffirmed Parliament’s power to amend any part of the Constitution, including fundamental rights, in response to judicial limitations.
• Societal and Economic Changes: Amendments ensure the Constitution stays in tune with the country’s evolving needs. For instance, the 86th Amendment (2002) made the Right to Education a fundamental right, ensuring that all children aged 6–14 receive free and compulsory education.
• Protection of Fundamental Rights: Over time, constitutional amendments have expanded and clarified fundamental rights to address the changing values of society. For example, the 93rd Amendment (2005) introduced reservations for backward classes in educational institutions, ensuring greater inclusivity.
• Fostering Governance and Democracy: Amendments such as the 61st Amendment (1989), which lowered the voting age, encouraged greater youth participation in democracy and ensured a more inclusive electoral process.
•  Social Justice and Equality: Constitutional amendments have aimed to address historical injustices and promote inclusivity for marginalized communities. The 93rd Amendment (2005), for example, extended reservations to private educational institutions for backward classes, ensuring equality in access to education.

See more: Conference of the Parties (COP 29) | UPSC

Criticisms of Constitutional Amendments

• Undermining Constitutional Stability: The 42nd Amendment (1976) has been criticized for attempting to alter the Constitution’s basic structure, resulting in the over-centralization of power, which threatened the stability and democratic fabric of the nation.
• Lack of Agreement: Some amendments have been criticized for being passed without sufficient consultation with the public or key stakeholders. This has raised concerns about the democratic process and transparency in the amendment procedure.
• Risk of Overuse: India has made over 100 constitutional amendments since 1950, a frequency far higher than other democracies, such as the United States, which has only 27 amendments. Critics argue that the frequent amendments dilute the Constitution’s strength and stability.
• Political Inclinations: Many amendments have been perceived as politically motivated. For example, the 39th Amendment (1975), which placed the election of the Prime Minister beyond judicial review, was seen as a way to protect Prime Minister Indira Gandhi during the Emergency period.
• Fissures in Federalism: Amendments like the 42nd Amendment (1976) have been criticized for weakening the federal structure of India. By centralizing power in the hands of the Union government, these changes diminished the autonomy of state governments.