Insights from the 16th Summit
- The 16th BRICS Plus Summit, held in Kazan, Russia, marked a historic moment as it welcomed the expanded BRICS+ group, including new members such as Egypt, Ethiopia, the UAE, Iran, and Saudi Arabia.
- This summit also featured a special outreach conference that brought together around 30 leaders from the Global South
Key Outcomes of the 16th BRICS Summit
Kazan Declaration:
- The summit adopted the Kazan Declaration, which highlighted the need for a fairer global governance structure and emphasized the importance of resolving international conflicts through dialogue and peaceful means.
Introduction of BRICS Pay:
- An alternative payment system to SWIFT was launched, aiming to facilitate trade among member nations while decreasing reliance on Western financial systems.
Establishment of the BRICS Grain Exchange:
- This initiative is designed to boost food security and promote agricultural cooperation among BRICS Plus countries, addressing pressing global food challenges.
Cross-Border Payment System Feasibility:
- Discussions were held on the feasibility of a BRICS Cross-Border Payment System to enhance integration among member economies and streamline transactions.
Political and Security Cooperation:
- The summit called for reforms in global institutions like the UN and IMF to ensure that developing countries have equitable representation and a voice in global decision-making.
Read also: Global Supply Chain Management: Challenges & Strategies | UPSC
Historical Evolution of BRICS
- 2001: Jim O’Neill, a Goldman Sachs economist, coined the term “BRIC” to identify the emerging economies of Brazil, Russia, India, and China. He forecasted that these nations would significantly influence the global economy by 2050.
- 2006: The BRIC nations held their first informal meeting at the G8 Outreach Summit in St. Petersburg, Russia, signaling the start of diplomatic engagement among these countries.
- 2009: The inaugural BRIC summit took place in Yekaterinburg, Russia, where leaders discussed global governance and economic collaboration.
- 2010: South Africa was invited to join the group, leading to its rebranding as BRICS Plus.
- 2014: The New Development Bank (NDB) was officially launched with an initial capital of $100 billion to support development finance initiatives.
- 2023: The BRICS grouping expanded to BRICS+ with the admission of six new member states: Saudi Arabia, Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, Argentina, and the UAE.
Significance of BRICS
Advocating a Multipolar Global Order:
- BRICS promotes a multipolar world where political and economic equality is prioritized. The expanded BRICS now represents about 41% of the global population and around 28% of the world’s GDP.
Countering Western Dominance:
- By providing an alternative to Western-dominated coalitions like the G-7, BRICS embodies a vision of a new world order that seeks independence from Western hegemony.
Platform for the Global South:
- BRICS serves as a platform for Global South countries to voice their concerns on international issues, helping to shape global agendas. The recent inclusion of nations like Egypt and Ethiopia further expands this representation.
Alternative to Bretton Woods Institutions:
- BRICS offers alternatives to the World Bank and IMF, which are often viewed as serving Western interests. Initiatives like the NDB and BRICS Pay align with the economic needs of developing nations.
Decoupling from the Dollar:
- Representing about 23% of global GDP and 18% of world trade, BRICS aims to de-dollarize international trade by encouraging the use of domestic currencies in transactions.
Oil Trade Collaboration:
- BRICS+ includes six of the top ten oil-producing nations, representing approximately 45% of global oil production capacity. This provides opportunities for collaboration beyond the traditional OPEC+ framework.
Commitment to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs):
- BRICS is dedicated to addressing issues such as poverty and food security, aligning with the United Nations’ SDGs to create a more equitable world.
Challenges Facing BRICS
- Chinese Influence: There is concern over China’s push for favorable expansion, including nations like Belarus. India views this as a potential shift towards a China-centric BRICS.
- Identity and Focus: BRICS grapples with balancing its core focus on financial cooperation versus expanding into a broader geopolitical coalition by welcoming more countries.
- Political Divisions: The diverse political systems among member nations complicate consensus-building, particularly on issues like UNSC reforms.
- Economic Disparities: Economic differences among member countries create challenges for collective action, as nations like China and India lead while Brazil and Russia face economic struggles.
- Dominance of China: With China accounting for 38% of BRICS exports, its economic clout can overshadow other member nations, potentially fostering resentment and nationalism.
- Limited Reform Impact: BRICS has not yet succeeded in effecting substantial reforms in Bretton Woods institutions or achieving significant de-dollarization.
- Consensus on Global Issues: Differences in perspectives on key international issues, such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict, hinder unified decision-making. For instance, China tends to support Russia, while India adheres to its Non-Alignment Strategy.
Way Forward
- Rule-Based Framework: BRICS Plus should prioritize a rule-based approach to minimize economic hegemony and discourage anti-West agendas, fostering a cooperative spirit among member states.
- Reducing Dominance of Key Players: To truly represent a diverse range of emerging markets, BRICS must lessen the dominance of the trio—Russia, India, and China—and embrace a more inclusive approach.
- Clear Membership Criteria: Establishing transparent criteria for new members is vital for maintaining cohesion and focus within the group as it expands.
- Balancing Chinese Influence: India should adopt strategies to counterbalance China’s influence within BRICS, ensuring an equitable distribution of power and resources.
- Permanent Secretariat: The establishment of a permanent secretariat could enhance coordination and facilitate the smooth functioning of BRICS, ensuring effective collaboration.
- Enhancing Economic Cooperation: Initiatives such as the BRICS Grain Exchange and Cross-Border Payment System should be prioritized to deepen economic ties and reduce dependence on Western financial institutions.
- Strengthening Political Dialogue: Member nations should work towards resolving political differences through dialogue, striving for consensus on contentious issues that impact collective decision-making.
Read also: India-China LAC Agreement: Implications for Border Peace | UPSC
Conclusion
- The 16th BRICS Summit has laid the groundwork for an expanded and influential coalition that embodies a significant portion of the global population and economy. By addressing internal challenges and embracing a collaborative approach, BRICS Plus can strengthen its position as a key player in the international arena.
- The potential of BRICS lies in its commitment to fostering a more equitable global governance structure and promoting the voices of the Global South. As BRICS continues to evolve, its adaptability to the changing geopolitical landscape will be crucial for its relevance and success in the coming years.
