Empowering Urban Local Bodies in India | UPSC

Introduction

  • Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) are at the forefront of Indiaโ€™s urban development and governance.
  • Despite their critical role, a recent Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) report has highlighted alarming concerns.
  • The report revealed a 42% gap between the resources and expenditures of ULBs across 18 states.
  • Additionally, only 32% of their revenue is generated independently, with the rest coming from state and central government transfers.
  • These challenges underline the need to reassess the structure, functions, and support provided to ULBs.

Constitutional Mandate and Structure of Urban Local Bodies in India

  • The 74th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992, was a landmark in urban governance, establishing the constitutional framework for ULBs.
  • It introduced Part IX-A (Articles 243P to 243ZG) and the 12th Schedule, which lists 18 functional areas assigned to municipalities, including urban planning, public health, and infrastructure development.
  • Types of ULBs:
    • Municipal Corporations: For cities with populations over one million (e.g., Mumbai, Delhi, Bengaluru), focusing on large-scale urban governance.
    • Municipalities: Governing smaller cities with populations under one million.
    • Notified Area Committees: Established for rapidly growing towns lacking adequate infrastructure.
    • Town Area Committees: Manage limited functions such as drainage and street lighting in smaller towns.
    • Cantonment Boards: Administer civilian areas in cantonments under the central government.
    • Townships: Provide services in industrial colonies; function without elected representatives.
    • Port Trusts: Manage civic amenities in port cities like Mumbai and Chennai while focusing on port administration.
    • Special Purpose Agencies: Handle specific urban functions like water supply, transport, and housing.

Read also: Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities in India | UPSC

Why Urban Local Bodies Matter?

  • Urban Planning and Development: ULBs create master plans to guide sustainable urban growth and optimize land use. For instance, municipal corporations prepare comprehensive blueprints for city infrastructure.
  • Service Delivery: They ensure essential services like water supply, waste management, street lighting, and public health services are accessible to urban residents.
  • Disaster Management: ULBs lead local responses during crises, such as the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporationโ€™s (BMC) efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic and Mumbai floods.
  • Empowerment of Women and Marginalized Groups: Mandatory reservations for women and marginalized communities under the 74th Amendment have increased their participation in local governance.
  • Community Engagement: Through mechanisms like ward committees and public consultations, ULBs foster grassroots participation, echoing Gandhijiโ€™s vision of โ€˜Poorna Swarajโ€™ and democratic decentralization.

Challenges Facing Urban Local Bodies in India

Financial Constraints:

  • Dependence on Transfers: Over 35% of ULB revenue comes from state and central transfers, which are minimal compared to other nations.
  • Post-GST Revenue Loss: The GST regime subsumed critical revenue sources like octroi and entertainment taxes. For example, the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) lost โ‚น7,000 crore annually due to octroi abolition.
  • Underutilized Property Tax: Indian ULBs raise only 10-11% of revenue from property tax, compared to 20-22% in China.
  • Limited Taxation Powers: Unlike developed nations, ULBs in India lack authority to levy robust taxes. For example, Chinese ULBs generate substantial revenue by selling land-use rights, while Danish municipalities impose local income taxes.
  • Delayed State Finance Commissions: Many states fail to establish or implement State Finance Commission recommendations, limiting resource allocation.

Functional Limitations:

  • Parastatal Agencies: State-level parastatal bodies control critical urban functions like water supply and transport, diminishing ULB autonomy.
  • Incomplete Devolution of Powers: States often retain control over the 18 functions listed in the 12th Schedule, undermining local governance.
  • Inactive District Planning Committees (DPCs): Many states lack functional DPCs, hindering integrated planning at the district level.

Administrative Challenges:

  • Election Delays: Some ULBs, like Bengaluruโ€™s BBMP, have been without elected bodies for years due to state government delays.
  • Criminalization: The rise of representatives with criminal backgrounds undermines effective governance.
  • โ€˜Corporator Patiโ€™ Syndrome: Women representatives are often overshadowed by their male relatives, reducing genuine political empowerment.
  • Bureaucratic Control: Municipal commissioners appointed by state governments wield disproportionate power, relegating elected mayors to ceremonial roles.
  • Staff Shortages: Over 35% of posts in municipal corporations remain vacant, affecting service delivery.

Functional Inefficiencies

  • Unplanned Urbanization: ULBs struggle with issues like slums, traffic congestion, and inadequate infrastructure due to ineffective planning.
  • Corruption: Scandals like contract irregularities in the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) erode public trust.
  • Coordination Gaps: Poor coordination among central, state, and local authorities delays policy implementation.

See this: Rise of Women in Indian Politics: Challenges, and Progress | UPSC

Way Forward

Recommendations from the 6th ARC:

  • Metropolitan Planning Committees: Establish these bodies to integrate and coordinate urban development.
  • Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (UMTA): Streamline urban transport and traffic management.
  • Strengthen ULBs: Conduct regular elections, devolve functions, and ensure adequate funding.
  • National Urban Development and Housing Fund (NUDHF): Support housing and urban infrastructure projects.
  • PPP Models and E-Governance: Adopt public-private partnerships and digitize governance for greater transparency and accountability.

NITI Aayogโ€™s Recommendations:

  • Enhancing Financial Autonomy: Allow ULBs to expand revenue sources and increase central funding.
  • Capacity Building: Train municipal staff and urban planners to address modern challenges effectively.
  • Citizen Participation: Strengthen ward committees and engage civil society in governance.

CAGโ€™s Suggestions:

  • Empower ULBs: Grant them autonomy in urban planning and development.
  • Policy Reforms: Introduce stronger frameworks to ensure economic, environmental, and democratic vibrancy in urban governance.
Scroll to Top