Tribunals in India: Roles, Importance and Constitutional Framework

Your UPSC Prep, Our Commitment
Start with Free Mentorship Today!

Table of Contents

India is a democratic country with a complex legal system that provides a variety of mechanisms for dispute resolution. One such mechanism is a tribunal, which is an adjudicatory body that specialises in resolving specific types of disputes. Tribunals in India play a vital role in ensuring efficient and effective justice delivery to citizens. They offer an alternative to the traditional court system and are designed to provide speedy and cost-effective resolution of disputes.

Tribunals in India are established under various laws and statutes, including the Constitution of India, and they have a wide jurisdiction over different types of disputes. They are headed by judicial or administrative members who have relevant expertise in the field they are adjudicating. Some of the prominent tribunals in India include the National Green Tribunal, the Central Administrative Tribunal, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, and the Securities Appellate Tribunal.

Need for Tribunals in India

Tribunals play a critical role in the justice delivery system of India. A tribunal is a quasi-judicial body that is created to deal with disputes arising in specific areas of law. Tribunals have been established to provide speedy and efficient resolution of disputes. Following are reasons why tribunals are necessary in India. 

  • Overburdened Judiciary: First, the sheer number of cases in the Indian legal system is overwhelming. According to the National Judicial Data Grid, as of January 2023, there were more than 5 crore cases pending in the Indian courts. This backlog is due to a number of factors, including a shortage of judges and court infrastructure, lengthy procedures, and the complex nature of some cases. By establishing tribunals, the government intends to ease the burden on the regular courts, and expedite the resolution of disputes in specific areas of law.
  • Specialisation: Tribunals are specialised bodies that are composed of experts in specific fields. For example, the National Green Tribunal is composed of judges and subject experts with specialised knowledge in environmental law, and the Securities Appellate Tribunal is composed of experts in securities law. These specialised tribunals are better equipped to handle complex cases in their respective fields, and can provide more informed and efficient resolutions than regular courts.
  • Accessibility: Tribunals are designed to provide a more informal and accessible forum for dispute resolution. The rules of procedure in tribunals are generally simpler and more flexible than those in regular courts. The tribunal process is often less formal, and parties can represent themselves without the need for legal counsel. This makes tribunals a more accessible forum for individuals who may not have the means to hire a lawyer or navigate the complex procedures of regular courts.
  • Speedy justice: Tribunals provide a faster resolution of disputes. The procedural rules in tribunals are designed to be more efficient and streamlined than those in regular courts. This means that cases are generally disposed of more quickly in tribunals than in regular courts. This is especially important in areas of law where quick resolution is critical, such as labour disputes, tax appeals, and intellectual property disputes.
  • Administrative accountability: Tribunals provide an additional layer of checks and balances in the legal system. In addition to regular courts, tribunals act as a forum for review of administrative decisions. This ensures that decisions made by government agencies and other administrative bodies are subject to scrutiny by independent bodies. This enhances the accountability of government agencies and ensures that the rule of law is upheld.

How Does a Tribunal Differ From a Traditional Court?

  • The court is a part of the traditional justice system, while tribunal is a body created via a statute which has been endowed with judicial powers. 
  • While courts are bound by the rules of procedure and evidence, tribunals are bound by the principles of natural justice and not the civil procedure code nor the rules of evidence.
  • A court has general jurisdiction over matters including civil, criminal, revenue, etc. On other hand, jurisdiction of tribunals is limited and extends over specific matters provided in the respective legislations.
  • Judges in courts are trained in law, but adjudicators in tribunals may or may not be trained in law. Membership of tribunals is not restricted to members from judiciary alone. Persons with expertise in specific fields can also be appointed as members of tribunals. For instance, the National Green Tribunal has non-judicial members with expertise in environmental matters.

Constitutional Provisions for Tribunals in India

Tribunal system was not part of the original constitution. The 42nd Amendment Act of 1976 added a new Part XIV-A to the Constitution. This part is titled as ‘Tribunals’ and consists of following articles- 

  • Article 323A: It provides for administrative tribunals. The article states that the Parliament may, by law, provide for the adjudication or trial by administrative tribunals of disputes and complaints with respect to recruitment and conditions of service of persons appointed to the service of government.
  • Article 323B: It provides for tribunals for other matters. The article states that the appropriate Legislature may, by law, provide for the adjudication or trial by tribunals of any disputes, complaints, or offences with respect to all or any of the matters specified.

UPSC Articles

UPSC Interview UPSC Interview Marks
UPSC Syllabus UPSC Exam Pattern
UPSC Eligibility UPSC Age Limit
UPSC Selection Process UPSC Cut off

Courses From Tarun IAS

Recent Posts

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Achieve Your UPSC Dreams – Enroll Today!